COMPUTER BENCHMARK FOR 3D ANIMATION PRO

And of course, the fact that they can throw more die area and power at the problem doesn't hurt either. Nvidia's lead is the key areas is undisputed, but much of that lead is because they offer features that Apple yet lacks (like hardware RT), have iterated the hell out of their SIMT architecture since Tesla, and overall have a much more mature implementation. But please do consider that Apple is a newcomer to the desktop GPU market, while Nvidia has been doing it since forever. There were some interesting points there though. It would be awesome to get this on the AS GPUs as it would be really fast and you wouldn't need to swap things to GPU memory as it's already there.Įither way, kind of feel that the benchmark scores were possibly the least interesting takeaway from the video. He also brings up one of the areas that's not really touched on elsewhere which is rig evaluation speeds, particularly in Maya where you can offload it onto the GPU for much faster evaluation (and also GPU cache for faster feedback).

COMPUTER BENCHMARK FOR 3D ANIMATION PRO

This is an area that the MacBook Pro excels at, with its fast ssd, large vram and unix based os (windows is terrible in terms of latency). Sir Wade Neistadt is more on the animation than rendering side of things I wouldn't really take much away from rendering numbers (other than the 4090 is fast), but he raises some more interesting points with regards to workflow and benefits to the artist that having such a fast card provides. From the same video he points out that on another scene one frame took 40min on a 3090 and over 23 hours a frame on a 3080 likely due to vram issues, so the M1Pro would be faster than a 3080 (probably a M2 MacBook Air would be faster than a 3080 ).

Computer benchmark for 3d animation